In the two poems of Yamanoue no Okura, one may observe that the imagery first to come to mind is the ‘treasure’ found in both poems, however, the tone and narrative of the poems surpasses the limitations of what ‘treasure’ can equate to. However, by looking at ‘Mortality’ as the unifying imagery, Yamanoue no Okura depicts it as the whole human experience. It is the sense of helplessness in the face of the divine or of temporal passage. It is also the sense of weakness, for mortality is always equated with being flawed, unlike the perfect being which is a god. For the first poem, found in Man’youshuu V: 806-807, the voice of the poem expresses a deep longing for something that is unreachable. Information is given to the reader through observations on the passing of time using the choice of the food the narrator partakes: melons for summer and chestnuts for winter, noticed after repetitive experiences. The narrator even voices out his pains and sorrow – the helplessness – that reminds him daily of the situation he is in. The envoy of the poem creates a striking conclusion to the narrative. It explains that while the narrator may have monetary compensation, there lies a great distance, geographically, that separates the narrator and his family. The tone of the narrative also changes in the envoy. From the longing and the suffering, there is now a sense of surrender as the narrator draws a conclusion, both that his family is worth more than any treasure and that he cannot change his current fate. A similar imagery of mortality can be observed in the second poem found in Man’youshuu V: 909-911, where it is depicted in two ways. Firstly, there is the mortality of the child that the narrator observes through specific life experiences. As a person, imperfect and without divine powers, the longing for security and interpersonal relations is clearly depicted with the way the narrator fondly recalls the events. It is a human touch that hinges in our understanding the ‘value of love’ that this particular family possessed, which explains why, when the narrative arrives at the ‘father’s praying for a miracle’ and ultimately the child’s passing, the immediate actions of the father is something we can sympathise with. The second way mortality was depicted in this poem was through the father’s act of witnessing the events and the helplessness to change the outcome. The moment he prays for divine intervention is his surrender, and his anguish after the boy’s death is when he realises he has no control over his fate or of anyone’s. Control is a concept humans always pursue because humans have a clear understanding that they lack something– and in this poem, it was the power to stop death. Like the first poem, the envoy in the second provides a perfect ending to the narrative, with its only difference being the tone, now a decisive, if not commanding, one – a natural response of human grief.
(November 26, 2015)
(November 26, 2015)
Comments
Post a Comment