Skip to main content

Precis: " The Birth of Godzilla: Nuclear Fear and the Ideology of Japan as Victim" (1993) by Morris Low

In his 1993 article, “The Birth of Godzilla: Nuclear Fear and the Ideology of Japan as Victim”, Morris Low looks into the ideology associated with the atomic bomb and focuses on the Godzilla monster movies of the 1950s and their meaning for Japanese and Americans. His discussions can focuses on the following themes, 'fear of the nuclear and involvement of science’; 'monster mania' (particularly in cinema); 'birth of Godzilla' (social climate and involvement of science and technology); ‘Japan and USA’s perception of monster movies, particularly of Godzilla, which includes narrative editing’; ‘transformation of Godzilla into a good monster’; and ‘Godzilla as either symbol or allegory of Japanese society.’ In doing so, Low gives a detailed analysis of the various factors that brought upon, not only the popularity of Godzilla in Japan and abroad, but also of the possible social commentaries that these movies would actually represent – which is to reflect the Japanese people’s inability to directly examine and confront the memories of war and the postwar consequences. As an article for the Japanese Studies Bulletin, this piece is well-paced and easily understandable by various readers, ranging from students and researchers alike, with properly cited arguments from different scholars. Perhaps, the only thing dissatisfactory is the brief conclusion that borders on essentializing Japan as a nation with an important role to fill.

(July 9, 2019)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bibliography: " Game Design as Narrative Architecture" (2004) by Henry Jenkins

Jenkins, Henry. 2004. “Game Design as Narrative Architecture.” In First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game , edited by Noah Wardrip-Fruin and Pat Harrigan, 118–30. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. In this article, Jenkins examines games less as stories than as spaces ripe with narrative possibility. He list downs the characteristics of games as defined by current Ludology versus Narratology debates such as: (1) not all games tell stories but they do have narrative aspirations, follows genre entertainment and previous narrative experiences; (2) narrative analysis need not be prescriptive; (3) games should not be reduced to the experience of a story; and (4) if games tell stories, they are unlikely to tell them in the same ways that other media tell stories for games as a medium, specifically, is what distinguishes them from other narrative traditions. He also lists down the problems and limitations within the current game study discourses, often pointing out how ...

Precis + Critical Response Paper: " The Imaginary" (2006) Chapter 1 part 1 by Claudia Strauss

Reevaluating Scholarships (October 17, 2019) In Claudia Strauss’s article “The Imaginary” (2006), she gives a detailed discussion and analysis of the major scholarships in cultural studies regarding the matter of the Imaginaries, such as the works of Castoriadis, Lacan, Anderson, and Taylor, in order to map out the essential arguments that are more popularly being used/cited in cultural studies research, before she examines how Ivy uses these concepts with regard to the national-imaginaries with the Japanese socio-cultural sphere. In summary, Strauss explains that Castoriadis was concerned with "concepts of cultural abstraction, reification and homogenization, while Lacan used the concept of the imaginary to explain fantasies, and Anderson and Taylor used the concept for explaining cultural models as potentially valuable when used with person-centered ethnographic methods to study real rather than abstract cultural subjects” (323). Despite the summation of the the...

Precis: "The Invention of the Martial Arts: Kano Jigoro and Kodokan Judo" (1998) by Inoue Shun

In Inoue Shun’s “The Invention of the Martial Arts: Kano Jigoro and Kodokan Judo” (1998), Inoue explores the modern invention, and subsequent reinvention, of the Japanese martial arts by an examination of Kodokan judo (163). This is done through a detailed discussion of Kano’s decision and active participation of creating the new martial arts such as: conception, process of modernization through scientification of the martial arts, promotions and competitions, institutionalizations and adoptions into various agencies (government institutions, universities, etc.), establishment of the Kodokan Cultural Association (promotion of the basic principles of Kodokan judo as well as serving as a legitimate infrastructure and governing body that actively promotes the new martial arts ideology), its inevitable re-invention post-Kano years by the Dai Nihon Butokukai (leading to an ultranationalistic role), and finally, a return to the sportification of budo post-WW2 in order to escape censorship wh...