Skip to main content

Precis: " Feeling Asian Modernities: Transnational Consumption of Japanese TV Dramas" (2004) by Koichi Iwabuchi

In his introduction to the book, “Feeling Asian Modernities: Transnational Consumption of Japanese TV Dramas” (2004), Koichi Iwabuchi explains the significance of the transnational reach of Japanese TV dramas as a modern popular cultural form within the East/Southeast Asian region by providing an alternative and destabilising the once exclusive equation of ‘modernity as with the Western world’, and how this creates recognition and appreciation of the similarities among the “non-Western” experiences of urbanisation, modernisation, and globalisation, which does not exist in American popular culture (such as shared colonial experiences.) He introduces the main theoretical issues in the study of cultural transnationalism to which each succeeding chapter will address, such as transnational alliance, entangled perception of cultural distance, postcolonial questions, and the (im)possibility of cultural dialogue, and that theoretical reformulation is imperative in order to grasp the gist of the decentering forces of globalisation that make transnational cultural flows and power relations much more disjunctive, non-isomorphic, and complex than can be understood in terms of a centre-periphery paradigm. He states that empirical analysis is used to analyse how Japanese youth dramas are (re)produced, circulated, regulated, and consumed in East and Southeast Asia, with each chapter addressing different ways for intra-Asian cultural flow highlights the cultural resonance and asymmetry in the region using the decentering process of globalisation. In addition, he reiterates the significance of these studies as contribution to the study of TV drama in Asia is underexplored as compared to other popular culture form (i.e. music, film). This introduction was written with an intent to give a glimpse of the overarching themes of transnational cultural flows and by highlighting the main issues to be addressed, this is intended for future researchers and students of cultural studies as well as media studies.

(December 20, 2016)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bibliography: " Game Design as Narrative Architecture" (2004) by Henry Jenkins

Jenkins, Henry. 2004. “Game Design as Narrative Architecture.” In First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game , edited by Noah Wardrip-Fruin and Pat Harrigan, 118–30. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. In this article, Jenkins examines games less as stories than as spaces ripe with narrative possibility. He list downs the characteristics of games as defined by current Ludology versus Narratology debates such as: (1) not all games tell stories but they do have narrative aspirations, follows genre entertainment and previous narrative experiences; (2) narrative analysis need not be prescriptive; (3) games should not be reduced to the experience of a story; and (4) if games tell stories, they are unlikely to tell them in the same ways that other media tell stories for games as a medium, specifically, is what distinguishes them from other narrative traditions. He also lists down the problems and limitations within the current game study discourses, often pointing out how ...

Precis + Critical Response Paper: " The Imaginary" (2006) Chapter 1 part 1 by Claudia Strauss

Reevaluating Scholarships (October 17, 2019) In Claudia Strauss’s article “The Imaginary” (2006), she gives a detailed discussion and analysis of the major scholarships in cultural studies regarding the matter of the Imaginaries, such as the works of Castoriadis, Lacan, Anderson, and Taylor, in order to map out the essential arguments that are more popularly being used/cited in cultural studies research, before she examines how Ivy uses these concepts with regard to the national-imaginaries with the Japanese socio-cultural sphere. In summary, Strauss explains that Castoriadis was concerned with "concepts of cultural abstraction, reification and homogenization, while Lacan used the concept of the imaginary to explain fantasies, and Anderson and Taylor used the concept for explaining cultural models as potentially valuable when used with person-centered ethnographic methods to study real rather than abstract cultural subjects” (323). Despite the summation of the the...

Precis: "The Invention of the Martial Arts: Kano Jigoro and Kodokan Judo" (1998) by Inoue Shun

In Inoue Shun’s “The Invention of the Martial Arts: Kano Jigoro and Kodokan Judo” (1998), Inoue explores the modern invention, and subsequent reinvention, of the Japanese martial arts by an examination of Kodokan judo (163). This is done through a detailed discussion of Kano’s decision and active participation of creating the new martial arts such as: conception, process of modernization through scientification of the martial arts, promotions and competitions, institutionalizations and adoptions into various agencies (government institutions, universities, etc.), establishment of the Kodokan Cultural Association (promotion of the basic principles of Kodokan judo as well as serving as a legitimate infrastructure and governing body that actively promotes the new martial arts ideology), its inevitable re-invention post-Kano years by the Dai Nihon Butokukai (leading to an ultranationalistic role), and finally, a return to the sportification of budo post-WW2 in order to escape censorship wh...