Skip to main content

Precis: " The Genbunitchi Movement. Its Origin, Development and Conclusion" (1978) by Nanette Twine

In Twine’s article, “The Genbunitchi Movement. Its Origin, Development and Conclusion” (1978), she explains the process through which the modern Japanese Language came to being after it struggled over years of criticism having been formed from what was then referred to as the colloquial style. She cites the important events that helped in the development and gave emphasis on the various discourses that it brought up, particularly between scholars, critics and political figures. The idea of a national language that was modern enough to incorporate new concepts while retaining its refined rhythm did not appeal to most critics until scholars began to put into the fore the developments and progress brought by such a “language” in other countries, in particular, the West. A language that would have been easily understood by all would mean that development would also follow, and this was rightfully portrayed when novelist began to use it for their works and proven its large following as well as the success of creating an understanding, having the appropriate language to fully document and portray life and the world. When the Genbunitchi Movement was finally approved after most of the Japanese had taken into it, the matters revolving the genbunitchi were then reduced to literary concerns about contextualising reality into written matter. Twine not only presented her discussion in a chronological view but also in varying perspectives from the different social spheres that would have strong influence over the genbunitchi matter. As presented, Twine wrote this article for a well-read audience who primarily studies linguistics and Japanese Literature.

(October 18, 2015)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bibliography: " Game Design as Narrative Architecture" (2004) by Henry Jenkins

Jenkins, Henry. 2004. “Game Design as Narrative Architecture.” In First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game , edited by Noah Wardrip-Fruin and Pat Harrigan, 118–30. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. In this article, Jenkins examines games less as stories than as spaces ripe with narrative possibility. He list downs the characteristics of games as defined by current Ludology versus Narratology debates such as: (1) not all games tell stories but they do have narrative aspirations, follows genre entertainment and previous narrative experiences; (2) narrative analysis need not be prescriptive; (3) games should not be reduced to the experience of a story; and (4) if games tell stories, they are unlikely to tell them in the same ways that other media tell stories for games as a medium, specifically, is what distinguishes them from other narrative traditions. He also lists down the problems and limitations within the current game study discourses, often pointing out how ...

Precis + Critical Response Paper: " The Imaginary" (2006) Chapter 1 part 1 by Claudia Strauss

Reevaluating Scholarships (October 17, 2019) In Claudia Strauss’s article “The Imaginary” (2006), she gives a detailed discussion and analysis of the major scholarships in cultural studies regarding the matter of the Imaginaries, such as the works of Castoriadis, Lacan, Anderson, and Taylor, in order to map out the essential arguments that are more popularly being used/cited in cultural studies research, before she examines how Ivy uses these concepts with regard to the national-imaginaries with the Japanese socio-cultural sphere. In summary, Strauss explains that Castoriadis was concerned with "concepts of cultural abstraction, reification and homogenization, while Lacan used the concept of the imaginary to explain fantasies, and Anderson and Taylor used the concept for explaining cultural models as potentially valuable when used with person-centered ethnographic methods to study real rather than abstract cultural subjects” (323). Despite the summation of the the...

Precis: "The Invention of the Martial Arts: Kano Jigoro and Kodokan Judo" (1998) by Inoue Shun

In Inoue Shun’s “The Invention of the Martial Arts: Kano Jigoro and Kodokan Judo” (1998), Inoue explores the modern invention, and subsequent reinvention, of the Japanese martial arts by an examination of Kodokan judo (163). This is done through a detailed discussion of Kano’s decision and active participation of creating the new martial arts such as: conception, process of modernization through scientification of the martial arts, promotions and competitions, institutionalizations and adoptions into various agencies (government institutions, universities, etc.), establishment of the Kodokan Cultural Association (promotion of the basic principles of Kodokan judo as well as serving as a legitimate infrastructure and governing body that actively promotes the new martial arts ideology), its inevitable re-invention post-Kano years by the Dai Nihon Butokukai (leading to an ultranationalistic role), and finally, a return to the sportification of budo post-WW2 in order to escape censorship wh...