Skip to main content

Precis: " Globalisation and the Bodily Performance of ' Cool' and ' Un-cool' Masculinities in Corporate Japan" (2010) by Romit Dasgupta

In Dasgupta’s article “Globalisation and the Bodily Performance of ‘Cool’ and ‘Un-cool’ Masculinities in Corporate Japan” (2010), he expounds on the notion that a shift in the times had also called for a shift in the manifestation of a gender image in the society of Japan, particularly in the workplace where everything of “man” is scrutinised as well as prescribed to. This was initially a reaction to the western’s concept of gendered hegemonic structure but was further developed into something “Japanese” because of historical and situational evidences that had formed the Japanese nation over the years. He also identifies that in scrutinising the body’s appearance could very well affect the impression of work ethics and discipline, both literally (the way a salaryman carries himself to project his personal discipline as a corporate soldier) and metaphorically (the hegemonic masculinity of Japan to represent its control, independence, success during the economic boom, and self-discipline which translate to transnational business relationships). However, this would also be challenged by the later years with the change in economic capacity and the ever changing global landscape and entrance of the younger generation who are now exposed to a wider variety of lifestyle and work options as opposed to the previous generations. Hence, the new image of the corporate hero is no longer the “salaryman” of the past, but the entrepreneurial, strict and economically rational figure would come to represent the new hegemonic ideal by 2000’s. And with this reshaping of the figurative image, came the reshaping of the actual physical form of the human body (the masculine gender) to fit modernity and progress, which suggests “always looking towards Euro-American standards”. This article was written with analytical description of the issues on globalisation and engendering corporate Japan, using frameworks discussed in other socio-anthropological courses, which entails that this article is interdisciplinary, but aimed primarily for the researchers and students of social sciences, though it still remains a comprehensible read for the average person.

(November 25, 2015)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bibliography: " Game Design as Narrative Architecture" (2004) by Henry Jenkins

Jenkins, Henry. 2004. “Game Design as Narrative Architecture.” In First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game , edited by Noah Wardrip-Fruin and Pat Harrigan, 118–30. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. In this article, Jenkins examines games less as stories than as spaces ripe with narrative possibility. He list downs the characteristics of games as defined by current Ludology versus Narratology debates such as: (1) not all games tell stories but they do have narrative aspirations, follows genre entertainment and previous narrative experiences; (2) narrative analysis need not be prescriptive; (3) games should not be reduced to the experience of a story; and (4) if games tell stories, they are unlikely to tell them in the same ways that other media tell stories for games as a medium, specifically, is what distinguishes them from other narrative traditions. He also lists down the problems and limitations within the current game study discourses, often pointing out how ...

Precis + Critical Response Paper: " The Imaginary" (2006) Chapter 1 part 1 by Claudia Strauss

Reevaluating Scholarships (October 17, 2019) In Claudia Strauss’s article “The Imaginary” (2006), she gives a detailed discussion and analysis of the major scholarships in cultural studies regarding the matter of the Imaginaries, such as the works of Castoriadis, Lacan, Anderson, and Taylor, in order to map out the essential arguments that are more popularly being used/cited in cultural studies research, before she examines how Ivy uses these concepts with regard to the national-imaginaries with the Japanese socio-cultural sphere. In summary, Strauss explains that Castoriadis was concerned with "concepts of cultural abstraction, reification and homogenization, while Lacan used the concept of the imaginary to explain fantasies, and Anderson and Taylor used the concept for explaining cultural models as potentially valuable when used with person-centered ethnographic methods to study real rather than abstract cultural subjects” (323). Despite the summation of the the...

Precis: "The Invention of the Martial Arts: Kano Jigoro and Kodokan Judo" (1998) by Inoue Shun

In Inoue Shun’s “The Invention of the Martial Arts: Kano Jigoro and Kodokan Judo” (1998), Inoue explores the modern invention, and subsequent reinvention, of the Japanese martial arts by an examination of Kodokan judo (163). This is done through a detailed discussion of Kano’s decision and active participation of creating the new martial arts such as: conception, process of modernization through scientification of the martial arts, promotions and competitions, institutionalizations and adoptions into various agencies (government institutions, universities, etc.), establishment of the Kodokan Cultural Association (promotion of the basic principles of Kodokan judo as well as serving as a legitimate infrastructure and governing body that actively promotes the new martial arts ideology), its inevitable re-invention post-Kano years by the Dai Nihon Butokukai (leading to an ultranationalistic role), and finally, a return to the sportification of budo post-WW2 in order to escape censorship wh...