Skip to main content

Precis: " Koxinga's Conquest of Taiwan in Global History: Reflections on the Occasion of the 350th Anniversary" (2012) by Tonio Andrade

In Tonio Andrade’s 2012 article, “Koxinga’s Conquest of Taiwan in Global History: Reflections on the Occasion of the 350th Anniversary”, one important argument to be made was quoted from Timothy Brook, 'The 17th century was a time of unprecedented intercultural communication: more people were in motion over longer distances and sojourning away from home for longer periods of time than at any other time in human history.’ This was an ‘Age of Partnership’ as Europeans sailed through Asia with Asian guides, and Asia, in turn, exchanged knowledge and technology with Europeans. This contact and movement between various people was the norm of this era. To this idea, Andrade establishes how nationalist views of Koxinga fail to realize that Koxinga was an embodiment of the fascinating globalizing world of the seventeenth century and that he won the war primarily because he was better at listening to people from the other side than were the Dutch. He supports this argument by giving a detailed account of Koxinga’s life such as being born in Japan, raised outside of traditional China, lived during a vibrant maritime in China’s history to a wealthy father who worked under the emblem of Santiago, spoke Portuguese, and used his knowledge on Japanese Samurai army tactics in modeling his fighting force. In this sense, this article proves significant to demonstrate how important world history movement is in understanding the political relations and events of the past, serving as an alternative to strictly nationalist and isolationist views.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bibliography: " Game Design as Narrative Architecture" (2004) by Henry Jenkins

Jenkins, Henry. 2004. “Game Design as Narrative Architecture.” In First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game , edited by Noah Wardrip-Fruin and Pat Harrigan, 118–30. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. In this article, Jenkins examines games less as stories than as spaces ripe with narrative possibility. He list downs the characteristics of games as defined by current Ludology versus Narratology debates such as: (1) not all games tell stories but they do have narrative aspirations, follows genre entertainment and previous narrative experiences; (2) narrative analysis need not be prescriptive; (3) games should not be reduced to the experience of a story; and (4) if games tell stories, they are unlikely to tell them in the same ways that other media tell stories for games as a medium, specifically, is what distinguishes them from other narrative traditions. He also lists down the problems and limitations within the current game study discourses, often pointing out how ...

Precis + Critical Response Paper: " The Imaginary" (2006) Chapter 1 part 1 by Claudia Strauss

Reevaluating Scholarships (October 17, 2019) In Claudia Strauss’s article “The Imaginary” (2006), she gives a detailed discussion and analysis of the major scholarships in cultural studies regarding the matter of the Imaginaries, such as the works of Castoriadis, Lacan, Anderson, and Taylor, in order to map out the essential arguments that are more popularly being used/cited in cultural studies research, before she examines how Ivy uses these concepts with regard to the national-imaginaries with the Japanese socio-cultural sphere. In summary, Strauss explains that Castoriadis was concerned with "concepts of cultural abstraction, reification and homogenization, while Lacan used the concept of the imaginary to explain fantasies, and Anderson and Taylor used the concept for explaining cultural models as potentially valuable when used with person-centered ethnographic methods to study real rather than abstract cultural subjects” (323). Despite the summation of the the...

Precis: "The Invention of the Martial Arts: Kano Jigoro and Kodokan Judo" (1998) by Inoue Shun

In Inoue Shun’s “The Invention of the Martial Arts: Kano Jigoro and Kodokan Judo” (1998), Inoue explores the modern invention, and subsequent reinvention, of the Japanese martial arts by an examination of Kodokan judo (163). This is done through a detailed discussion of Kano’s decision and active participation of creating the new martial arts such as: conception, process of modernization through scientification of the martial arts, promotions and competitions, institutionalizations and adoptions into various agencies (government institutions, universities, etc.), establishment of the Kodokan Cultural Association (promotion of the basic principles of Kodokan judo as well as serving as a legitimate infrastructure and governing body that actively promotes the new martial arts ideology), its inevitable re-invention post-Kano years by the Dai Nihon Butokukai (leading to an ultranationalistic role), and finally, a return to the sportification of budo post-WW2 in order to escape censorship wh...