Skip to main content

Response Paper: " Of Kimono and Cultural Appropriation" (2015) by Shaun O'Dwyer

In the article “Of Kimono and Cultural Appropriation” by Shaun O’Dwyer, the author recalls his visit to an old kimono factory in Kyoto under the illusion and prestige of what a kimono factory would look like as described in the literary text of Yasunari Kawabata’s “The Old City”. However, he describes his disappointment at finding the area lacking of its literary splendour, even witnessing the demise of a shop being demolished, and when given a tour of one of the old factories, would see that what helms these factories are no longer skilled weavers but machines with datas of the designs. He comments at what Kawabata once expressed as the future of the kimono industry’s death because of progress. He then segues to a certain art exhibit in New York where the kimono was put on a show alongside with European masterpieces that were inspired by them. He comments that the notion would have helped engage a wider audience for the artistry of the kimono, but there were protests for the exhibition, calling it a clear “Orientalism” exhibition that aims to marginalise the asian presence within a predominantly white world. Of course, even if those directly affected – the American-Japanese and Japanese living in America– would say otherwise, even pushing forth for the exhibition as a way to bridge cultural gaps, the exhibition was limited and carefully monitored due to the protesters’ claims. I think that the kimono is indeed a natural art treasure of Japan. In its weaving is a story of the lifestyle of Old Japan, especially how it is tied to many rituals and ancient customs. The exhibition, in my opinion, would have been a chance to bridge any cultural gaps, especially for those who have no first-hand experience of another culture. However, it cannot be denied that there are many who believe that everything society does is an attack to anyone. They, who use the theories and other scholarly works of the past and present to create further divide among people, are nothing short of being cynical in their attempts. At any time and point in history, culture and identity will always be pitted against the “other” for that is the only way a non-initiated can learn. However, it is the closeness of the mind of others that fabricates more injustice to a simple act. This, I believe no matter how contemporary their reasons are, is a backward way of thinking in a world that pushes for globalisation and understanding.

(June 13, 2016)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bibliography: " Game Design as Narrative Architecture" (2004) by Henry Jenkins

Jenkins, Henry. 2004. “Game Design as Narrative Architecture.” In First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game , edited by Noah Wardrip-Fruin and Pat Harrigan, 118–30. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. In this article, Jenkins examines games less as stories than as spaces ripe with narrative possibility. He list downs the characteristics of games as defined by current Ludology versus Narratology debates such as: (1) not all games tell stories but they do have narrative aspirations, follows genre entertainment and previous narrative experiences; (2) narrative analysis need not be prescriptive; (3) games should not be reduced to the experience of a story; and (4) if games tell stories, they are unlikely to tell them in the same ways that other media tell stories for games as a medium, specifically, is what distinguishes them from other narrative traditions. He also lists down the problems and limitations within the current game study discourses, often pointing out how ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Precis + Critical Response Paper: " The Imaginary" (2006) Chapter 1 part 1 by Claudia Strauss

Reevaluating Scholarships (October 17, 2019) In Claudia Strauss’s article “The Imaginary” (2006), she gives a detailed discussion and analysis of the major scholarships in cultural studies regarding the matter of the Imaginaries, such as the works of Castoriadis, Lacan, Anderson, and Taylor, in order to map out the essential arguments that are more popularly being used/cited in cultural studies research, before she examines how Ivy uses these concepts with regard to the national-imaginaries with the Japanese socio-cultural sphere. In summary, Strauss explains that Castoriadis was concerned with "concepts of cultural abstraction, reification and homogenization, while Lacan used the concept of the imaginary to explain fantasies, and Anderson and Taylor used the concept for explaining cultural models as potentially valuable when used with person-centered ethnographic methods to study real rather than abstract cultural subjects” (323). Despite the summation of the the...
Post a Comment
Read more

Precis: "The Invention of the Martial Arts: Kano Jigoro and Kodokan Judo" (1998) by Inoue Shun

In Inoue Shun’s “The Invention of the Martial Arts: Kano Jigoro and Kodokan Judo” (1998), Inoue explores the modern invention, and subsequent reinvention, of the Japanese martial arts by an examination of Kodokan judo (163). This is done through a detailed discussion of Kano’s decision and active participation of creating the new martial arts such as: conception, process of modernization through scientification of the martial arts, promotions and competitions, institutionalizations and adoptions into various agencies (government institutions, universities, etc.), establishment of the Kodokan Cultural Association (promotion of the basic principles of Kodokan judo as well as serving as a legitimate infrastructure and governing body that actively promotes the new martial arts ideology), its inevitable re-invention post-Kano years by the Dai Nihon Butokukai (leading to an ultranationalistic role), and finally, a return to the sportification of budo post-WW2 in order to escape censorship wh...
Post a Comment
Read more